Tabloid-magnet to bullet-magnet
The secret – which Matt Drudge told, of course – is out: Britain’s rash and handsome Harry has fought behind Afghanistan’s front lines for the past two months. Now Britain is yanking her royal son from the Helmland and bringing him home.
The prince, a military academy grad and third in line to the British throne, couldn’t serve with his troops in Iraq so he cut a secret deal to go to Afghanistan instead. Red-headed bad boy and “playboy prince,” he’s always had a wicked flair his slightly balding, boring older brother William lacks. (William’s contribution to the Afghanistan fight: A letter saying Princess Di would have been proud.)
And this time, the world’s reaction is not to frown on the recklessness of a guy once dumb enough to dress up like a Nazi for a costume party. Kathryn Jean Lopez gushes on The Corner, “Prince Harry seems like such an impressive young man,” not just because of his bravery but also because he seems miraculously cured of his booze thirst. John Noonan writes on The Weekly Standard blog, “This kind of leadership impresses me no end.” Human Events writes, “Prince Harry the hero puts Europe to shame.” The Morning Journal says,“A prince obviously doesn’t have to do such things.” Allan Mallinson’s pride is palpable: “Well, now Cornet Wales can look every soldier in the eye. Indeed, he can look the whole country in the eye. And his gritty determination to do his bit ought to have recruits clamouring at every barracks gate.”
In an embarrassingly-timed column today, Abe Greenwald claims that democracy is superior to monarchy because good looks correlate with high intelligence: “Our radiant, twinkling, and smoldering candidates are clear indications of the health of our democracy.” Greenwald proves his point by unforgivably ignoring William and Harry’s good looks, choosing instead to compare our potential leaders with the unfortunate-faced Prince Charles. “Erase the great experiment of America,” he says, “and we’d be poised to kneel at the throne of this dull and cowardly man who makes Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich look like Matt Damon and Ben Affleck.”
But Britons are allowed to be a little smug today: Erase the great American experiment and you could have some national pride in a prince who makes American worthies look, well, cowardly and dull. Commanders-in-chief usually conduct wars so far removed from the fight it’s like playing a computer game — push a button, make some sterile, artificial gore. Years ago, though, the men in charge of starting wars actually fought them. It didn’t lead to fewer wars, but it may have made for bigger, braver men.















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top15 Comments to “Tabloid-magnet to bullet-magnet”
Tabloid magnet to bullet magnet and forever and always, a chick magnet.
Just wanted to say how I feel.
Report comment to moderator
That is a good-looking kid, for sure! Personally, I think Diana would be appalled that her son is fighting, but I could be wrong. I do think she would be proud of both of her boys.
I give this kid credit for going to Afghanistan, and I think it’s a little mean that this was exposed. I am prepared to weigh his stupid kid stuff (the Nazi get up and the drinking, etc.) against his bravery and willingness to fight alongside his fellow Brits and give him a thumbs up. He’s done his bit, and his family has every reason to be proud of him.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think I’d like to have him as an employee or a neghibor, but as a prince, I think he has the right amount of derring-do.
Report comment to moderator
Harry’s heroism is equal to that of the other soldiers and that is high.
Bad judgment on Drudge’s part. That secret should have been left alone. There was no public need to know that over-rides Prince Harry’s right to decide to serve without fanfare and undue attention. Let him serve.
For Drudge to go public with it is to possibly motivate jihadists to step up their attacks on British troops due to the higher stakes that a prince represents.
Which is why they pulled him.
Report comment to moderator
I kind of hate to say it, but
Meh.
Report comment to moderator
I agree with Joel Mark that Drudge exposed not only Harry but all British soldiers to more risk. That aids and abets the enemy, doesn’t it?
Report comment to moderator
While Drudge seems to have broken the story, it appears he picked up that an Australian and German newspaper were about to break the story if you read his original post. Having said that “Shame on Drudge.” This only proves again that you cannot trust the press.
Bravo to Prince Harry. He is a 23 year old Sandhurst trained officer who wants to do his duty. I understand this very well. I’m reasonably sure he would want to stay longer if this had not leaked. But since it has, he recognizes that it is best for the unit that he leave.
Colonel, USMCR Ret.
Report comment to moderator
I have to say, I’m very impressed. And, I think it’s sick that it was leaked and he had to be pulled. He got to feel somewhat “normal” for ten weeks. He should have had the freedom to serve for as long as he desired, but in a way, letting them pull him out is also a sacrifice – of his dream, for the safety of those with whom he served.
And I’ll echo the other comments … that is one fantabulous pic of the young man
Report comment to moderator
You know you’re old when you read that Prince William is slightly balding! But I digress…
I wonder if there is any chance this was purposely leaked so that Harry would be forced out and look like a good guy after the Nazi thing. That’s cynical, I know, but I can’t help thinking that. Remember after he was in trouble for drugs and partying, he then went to Africa to do charitable work. Maybe he’s trying to work it all out or something.
Report comment to moderator
The child of the ruling family off to war to fight like a common soldier. You would think this would only occur in a republic not some country with the vestiges of aristocracy. Does anyone here not see the irony?
Report comment to moderator
Shame on the Australian and German Press and Matt Drudge! How hard would it have been to sit on the story until after Harry was done serving? These reporters have no self control or respect for the soldiers with whom Harry served. All they did was put Harry and his colleagues in danger. For shame!
Report comment to moderator
PTOil, don’t you think going to a real war against a bunch of looneybirds who wouldn’t think twice about beheading him is a bit much? And if he made up for the Nazi thing and the drinking by doing the charitable work in Africa, what’s he making up for now? I think you are too cynical.
HRW, Prince Andrew went off to war, too. And history will show you that lots of the aristocracy did their bit. They’re British!
Report comment to moderator
Perhaps your blinders refuse to see the irony in the situation. The Brits have their aristrocracy on the front line but the Americans leaders of the republic have their children getting smashed in Argentina or driving around the country in a motor home campaigning for dad.
Report comment to moderator
HRW – I see exactly what you’re saying, and it is ironic. It’s almost more democratic to have a prince fighting right next to a “commoner.” It puts them on an equal level.
Report comment to moderator
HRW has a good point. I think if every member of congress were required to have one of their children serving the military in Iraq, either (a) the war would never have been started in the first place, or (b) it would been brought to a quick end. That the war in Iraq was led by two men who avoided serving in Vietnam (Bush and Cheney) is even more ironic.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!