A “disastrous” year
What does the success of John McCain’s presidential campaign have to do with the number of disasters that will be declared this year? A lot, according to economist Erwann Michel-Kerjan. While conducting a larger study about the impact of catastrophes on the global economy, he analyzed the incidence of federally declared disasters since the early 1950s and came to two conclusions: 1) the incidence of disasters has risen over time; and 2) there are some conspicuous spikes during presidential election years:
What gives? Disaster declarations are presidential acts, which are undertaken at the chief executive’s discretion. While there are some quasi-official criteria–”You’re not going to declare a major disaster just because the wind is running at 10 miles per hour more than average,” Michel-Kerjan notes–the president has some flexibility. And it seems plausible that during an election year, a president seeking to be re-elected or who wants to help maintain his party’s control over the executive branch will try to be seen as a hands-on executive who dispenses aid to voters. Hence, when something bad happens in an election year–the Mississippi River floods, wildfires burn in the West–the president is quicker to declare a federal disaster than he would in a nonelection year. In 1996, President Clinton was so eager to feel his constituents’ pain that he declared 75 disasters, more than twice the number he declared in 1995 and 70 percent more than he did in 1997. But Michel-Kerjan says it’s too simplistic to blame the president. This is a bipartisan, bibranch development. Once the president declares a disaster, Congress decides how much cash to allocate for disaster relief. And in years when members of Congress are eager to be seen delivering goodies and care to their constituents, they’re likely to be more welcoming of opportunities to demonstrate their compassion.
Of course, the theory isn’t “bulletproof.” However, during the first two months of this election year, there have already been 10 federally declared disasters: “The final tally for the year will likely depend on a number of factors: the severity of the Western wildfire season, the number of hurricanes that develop in the Gulf of Mexico, and how much President Bush wants to help John McCain succeed him.”

















There should be a non-political board set up like the Federal Reserve to make these kinds of decisions. I don’t think the President should be the Insurer In Chief.
The people usually get the government they deserve. This business of defining disasters down has been going on for years and will continue to do so, as long as people are panting for federal handouts after experiencing ordinarily extreme natural events.
After the great earthquake and fire in San Francisco, the locals and the state pulled up their socks and made a quick recovery, mainly from private efforts with some local government help.
After the great earthquake and fire in San Francisco,
Oviously it was God punishing the gays.
Last night on the news they said Bush has spent 452 days on vacation since he was first signed in as president. Far more than any president in history. I feel we should have a moment of silence and give thanks. Every day he is on vaction is one less disaster.
9/11 was the most over-hyped and politically exploited “disaster” in the history of the country.
The actual toll of deaths and financial loss was modest (10% of our annual auto accident rate) yet we have responded by causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, including almost as many of our troops as 9/11 victims, and spending TRILLIONS of dollars in an insane military response.
Then there are the civil liberties and the respect of the world we have forfeited…
For some interesting numbers on the cost, just of the Iraq war:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/opinion/04herbert.html
9/11 was not about the body count, it was about an attack on our country.
I’d appreciate a link to something other than the George Soros funded Lancet report that proves the the United States has “caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people”