Problem progeny
Political success inevitably means closer scrutiny. So it is with Mike Huckabee, who now finds himself countering allegations that he used his position to get his son out of trouble. Although Huckabee denies any ethical lapses, the truth seems mired in murky details. Is the incident cause for concern among supporters, or merely the typical campaign dirt to sweep under the rug?















How Republican. First Bush (see SEC, Military, College), now Huckabee. This is why I’m suspicous of the “elite”.
Forget his his kids he took money to get others out of trouble and jail also.
The first President I remember was Truman. I’ve never warmed to any sitting President or any of the candidates.
I was starting to feel a tepid attraction to Huckabee. In a field where I would put most of the candidates at -10, he had oozed up to -2 in my radar.
Now I am shocked and disappointed.
Really, there is only one candidate whose past would be spotless enough to stand the scrutiny a candidate gets these days.
However, I don’t think He would meet the Constitutional restrictions on place of birth.
This is starting to get too easy.
I’ll just leave this one alone.
The guy was a TV preacher for years and people are surprised to find out he’s corrupt?
Anyone see where his church won’t release his old sermons to the media?